Regarding the issue of crime prevention, Article 8 of the Constitution defines public and sovereign duty with regard to the issue of enjoining the good and forbidding the evil, but a group that considers the criminal phenomenon as a human and social issue that may Every
More
Regarding the issue of crime prevention, Article 8 of the Constitution defines public and sovereign duty with regard to the issue of enjoining the good and forbidding the evil, but a group that considers the criminal phenomenon as a human and social issue that may Every religious community should emerge and consider the prevention of crime to require the use of scientific achievements and teachings, and with the premise that the need to implement criminal law, which is also mentioned in Article 4 of the Constitution, this "They conclude that according to Article 165, paragraph 5, of the Constitution, they consider the appropriate action to prevent the occurrence of crime and to correct criminals as the duties of the judiciary." Perhaps due to the unscientific approach to this issue, the role of crime prevention in the judiciary is a subjective and ceremonial matter, and as a result, a large number of elites, lawyers, criminologists and sociologists did not dare to criticize and enter into this issue, and this The subconscious issue led to the judiciary being dominated by criminals and the influence of power and wealth caused a structural crisis in the face of criminals, but with the emergence of new horizons and the helm of new judges and fundamental changes and the fight against White-collar and coarse-grained criminals have once again revived the hope in society that the judiciary is the flagship of the fight against crime and the criminal phenomenon, and more importantly, the forerunner of crime prevention.
Manuscript profile
